The No Commercial Planes on 9/11 Hypothesis under Investigation[1]
In an
article published first on April 18, 2004, Gerard
Holmgren started the hypothesis that in fact no commercial planes were involved
in the September 11, 2001, attacks on the Twin Towers, the Pentagon and the
crash in a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.[2]
This
hypothesis had taken many by surprise as most people were familiar with 9/11
media coverage which included the crashes of planes into both Twin Towers. The
majority of people did not take this statement from Holmgren serious and
classified it as a ludicrous conspiracy theory.
The purpose
of this document is to investigate if the Holmgren hypothesis is indeed invalid
and should be disregarded or if it is correct. For that matter, the
argumentations and facts in favour or against this hypothesis will be mentioned
and analysed on its merits. This will be done by discussing first each of the four
events that involved planes on that fatal day of September 11 in 2001 in a
separate way. Thereafter general aspects that involved all four events will be
investigated in detail.
The
Attack on the Northern Twin Tower
According to the official version American Airlines Flight 11 (AA 11), a Boeing
767-200 en route from Boston to Los Angeles carrying 81 passengers, nine flight
attendants and two pilots, crashed into the Northern Twin Tower of New York's
World Trade Center about 8:45 a.m. ET.
The first
crash was never broadcasted live. The only footage of this crash appeared until
the following day, 16 hours after the impact. This is a video from the Naudet
brothers who were on that day filming for their documentary on New York
firefighters.[3] In
this video you can hear the sound of a plane and see how this object crashes
into the North Tower and disappears totally within it with a big explosion. The
wings and fuselage of the plane sliced through the steel cover of the building
and left openings resembling their shape. In the Naudet video the shape and colour
of the plane are not clear. A remastered version of this video[4]
gives a better image of the flying object but still you cannot see clearly that
it concerns a Boeing 767 from American Airlines. After a frame by frame
analysis Holmgren stated that the flying
object was a fuzzy small, rather squat looking triangular shaped craft -
nothing like a Boeing 767 and way too small, which divebombs into the tower in a
manner which would appear to be impossible for a large airliner. I took several
screenshots from the remastered version of the Naudet video and got similar
results. The flying object resembles better a triangular stealth aircraft than
a Boeing 767 commercial airplane. Once it hits the North Tower the wings or
other parts of the object do not break and there are no large parts of the
object that one can see falling down to the ground. The entire object enters
the building and explodes.
WTC 9/11 | First Plane Hit in North Tower | Jules Naudet Video (Remastered 60fps AI Upscaled) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=St7ny38gLp4
Crash into the North Tower Source: http://www.911deanderewaarheid.nl/pagina7.html
It is
believed that a portion of the main landing gear of AA 11 exited WTC 1 at the
94th or 95th floor and landed at the corner of Rector and West Streets (some
five blocks south of the WTC complex). This debris is believed to be a tire,
wheel, brake assembly, and hub of a main landing gear.[5]
Portion
of the main landing gear of AA 11 exited WTC 1 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wtc05-orig-2001-09-11-09-13-05-Charles-Marsh.jpg
A 767-200
fully loaded commercial plane is about 180 tons in weight. The Twin Towers were
designed to carry 13000 tons. A plane crashing into the Twin Towers would most
probably not be able to do anything to the major building. It could affect
localized structural elements. It could knock out a column for example. The
Twin Towers were designed for airliners impacts so that the building structure
would survive such impacts. Furthermore, the aluminium material of the
implicated commercial airplane is not able to penetrate a strong steel building
such as the Twin Tower. However, there
were clear signs of cuts in the building that had the shape of airplane wings.
But the aluminium airplane wings are not able to cut through steel materials.
Same applies to the hole that apparently was caused by the plane fuselage. So
how could the building get holes that are shaped like a plane if the plane
could not penetrate the steel columns? The Naudet video of the North Tower
sheds light on how this may have been done. Several seconds after the alleged
plane is seen to have penetrated the building something happens on the surface
of the building. Flashes of light (explosions?) can be seen which cause damage at
the position of the supposed wing hole which was created well after the alleged
impact.[6]
AA 11 hit
the North Tower at a speed of almost 500 mph. The maximum operating velocity
(VMO) for a Boeing 767 is, however, only 414 mph at sea level. The VMO should
never be exceeded at low altitudes. But AA 11 did and under such conditions this
commercial plane would have started to flutter, that is lose parts of their
wings, landing gear and fuselage. In fact it would have been impossible to hit
the target under these circumstances. Especially for a poor trained
inexperienced hijacker.[7]
The final
speed of AA 11 just before hitting the North Tower matches better the use of a
military aircraft such as a drone or stealth fighter. However, many facts suggest
that commercial airlines were used in the 9/11 attacks. First of all we have the
main landing gear portion that was found at some distance from the WTC complex
and was believed to belong to AA 11. Furthermore, rescue workers at the World
Trade Center site began to discover body fragments from Flight 11 victims
within days of the attack. Some workers found bodies strapped to airplane seats
and discovered the remains of a flight attendant with her hands bound, suggesting
the hijackers might have used plastic handcuffs.[8]
Within a year, medical examiners had identified the remains of 33 victims who
had been on board Flight 11.[9]
Finally, there were phone calls from flight attendant Betty Ong to Vanessa Minter
at American Airlines reservations and from flight attendant Madeline Sweeney to
American Airlines ground manager Michael Woodward at Logan in which they stated
that AA 11 had been hijacked.[10]
The official
version of what happened on 9/11 supplies the exact boarding times of the 5
alleged hijackers of AA 11 and states that Flight 11 pushed back from Gate 32, taxied
to its departure runway and took off at 7:59 A.M.[11]
Just before the plane took off ground service manager Michael Woodward entered
the plane for a last check. In the business class he made eye contact with the
passenger on seat 8D, who he later identified as Mohamed Atta. He left the
plane and it got permission to take off from departure runway 4R.[12]
The
official version has, however, a number of inconsistencies and raised concerns
about its truthfulness. Let us take first the airphone calls from the two
flight attendants. Both of them identified the flight as Flight 12, at least
twice, at the beginning of their respective conversations. According to Ong the
terrorists jammed their way up into the cockpit. That seems quite impossible
for a small place with already the pilot and co-pilot and an additional 5
terrorists with the door locked. Ong and Sweeney told that two flight
attendants had been stabbed and one passenger in row 9 had its throat cut. They
further said that the terrorists had a bomb, that they sprayed mace in the first/business
class which made it difficult to breathe and so the first/business class
passengers had to be relocated to coach. However, none of the 81 coach passengers,
sitting in front of working airphones placed a phone call. They must have been
aware of what had happened in business/first class as these passengers were now
standing next to them. Nowhere in her call does Ong even come close to asking
for help, or advice, or information, or assistance. There’s no urgency in her
voice. It seems that Betty Ong was taking part in a simulation, an exercise.[13]
After a
first failed attempt which did not connect and before her call to Woodward, Amy
Sweeney managed to reach Evie Nunez, a manager in the American Airlines flights
services office at Boston Logan Airport. This call lasted just over a minute
before it was cut off. Sweeney told Nunez that they were on Flight 12, at Gate
32 and that two flight attendants had been stabbed. Nunez asked Michael Woodward
to go down to Gate 32 and see what was going on. Michael, in turn, asked his
colleague Elizabeth Williams to accompany him on this mission. Together, the
two of them then walked to Gate 32, which was only a matter of two minutes’
walk from their office. Upon arrival at the gate, Williams and Woodward found
an empty airplane.[14]
Flight 11 was still parked at the gate, half an hour after its alleged
take-off, but the passengers were gone. Flight 11 was scheduled. However, the
fact that the NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board) data showed the time
as 00:00 indicates that the wheels never moved. This corresponds exactly to
what Elizabeth Williams saw and described. The plane was there. It had not
taken off.[15]
It seems
that Flight 11 on September 11, 2001, was a scripted exercise. A live hijacking
exercise conducted as part of the wargames under way that morning, including
Vigilant Guardian and Virgo Amalgam. In a possible scenario, the passengers and
crew were informed that they were now involved in a military drill as soon as the
doors of the flight closed at 7:40 am. They were asked to disembark the plane
and were taken somewhere. In that secure location Sweeney and Ong were
selected, and convinced, to play roles within the simulation, pretending to
phone in the details of the imaginary hijacking. It is impressed upon them that
they must not give the game away. Another object took off and was tracked on
radar. This may or may not have been the same object which crashed into the WTC
North Tower at 8:46am, but in any case, there was an object on radar being
tracked as Flight 11 even after this.[16]
From the
above it appears to be more plausible that some other object than a commercial
Boeing 767 hit the North Tower. Most probably a military aircraft that can reach
high speeds at sea level.
The Attack on the Southern Twin Tower
According
to the official version United Airlines (UA) Flight 175, a Boeing 767-200 bound
from Boston to Los Angeles, carrying 56 passengers, two pilots and seven flight
attendants crashed into the Southern Twin Tower of the World Trade Center
shortly after 9 a.m.
As this
crash occurred about 15 minutes after the first crash it has been broadcasted
by a number of live TV-shows and has been captured by many amateur video’s and
photographs. These live broadcasts show the approach of an object resembling a
commercial plane.
 |
  |
||
50 Views
of Plane Impact in South Tower | 9/11 World Trade Center (2001) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hApRZ_7v2A
(Evan Fairbanks footage left, Michael Hezarkhani footage top right and
Luc Courchesne footage bottom right)
The media
footage of the crash into the South Tower shows no signs of crumbling or
breaking or any collision with the building. We do not see any pieces coming
off. What we see is that the building is swallowing an airplane. Again, the
aluminium material of the implicated commercial airplane is not able to
penetrate steel buildings such as the South Twin Tower. The footage of the
second crash shows the plane practically flying through the building with its
nose coming out through the other side of the building. How could the nose of
the plane emerge from the other side as debris with keeping its original shape?
And why is there no clear hole on the other side of the building where the nose
came out? Flight 175 had a speed of 583
mph (513 knots) when it was heading for the South Tower. This is 129 knots over
the maximum safe speed of this type of an airplane at sea level and therefore
impossible.[17]
While
investigating the second crash footages some people wondered what these strange
objects attached to the underside of the Flight 175 might be, and whether they
were just an optical illusion. After a thorough digital image analysis a
Spanish university concluded that the objects were three-dimensional in nature
and could not have been caused by shadows or reflections.[18]
Some believed that the object attached under the plane fired a missile
that opened a large hole in the side of the tower just before the plane struck.
This plane had a grey belly and not dark blue as an United Airline plane would
be.[19]
Analysis of the plane dimensions showed that it’s fuselage was too long to be a
Boeing 767-200. The plane that hit the South Tower was therefore not Flight 175.[20]
Others noticed a flash before the plane burrowed into the building.[21]
Another remarkable observation made was the lack of reflecting light coming
from the plane surfaces although it was a sunny day and the images show very
little reflection effects. In some images the left wing of the plane that hit
the South Tower appears to have disappeared while later on the right wing
appears to have disappeared.[22]
Frank Smits, a Dutch investigator, suggests that a kind of plasma pencil
technology has been used on the objects that hit the Twin Towers. Plasma is a
type of highly ionized gas and putting plasma pencils on different positions of
a military aircraft creates a force field. In fact much smaller military
aircrafts were used and the plasma pencil technology visualized them as if they
were commercial airlines. A video shows how this could have been done in the
case of both Twin Towers.[23]
Source: The Plasma Plane https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmTSYQidOsk&t=14s
The
selected floors for impact were prepared prior to 9/11. When the plasma
camouflage reached the Twin Towers a first laser shot from a nearby building[24]
was fired to create the center hole enabling the military aircraft to enter and
thereafter core columns were blown out with explosives. The military aircraft
could enter the building without any resistance. When the plasma engines were
in the building laser shots made engine holes in the façade. Finally the plasma
camouflage model and the military aircraft exploded inside the North Tower. In the case of the South Tower the plasma camouflage
model pierced the building on the other side and was seen as the nose out
feature before it exploded showing a huge fireball. The smaller military
aircraft exploded inside the building.
The above
scenario is in line with the fact that according to the National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST) the tail section of Flight 175 traversed the
initial 159 feet inside the South Tower at a speed of 542 mph. So the airspeed
did not decrease much despite the resistance by the steel/concrete building.[25]
Aviation
records from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) show that although UA
175 existed as a flight, unlike AA 11, the plane to which this flight was assigned
- N612UA - was still registered and valid after 9/11. In other words, it never
crashed on 9/11.[26] The
used Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) showed
that Flight 175 was in the vicinity of Harrisburg and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
20 minutes after the aircraft allegedly impacted the South Tower in New York.[27]
So what
happened to Flight 175? A possible scenario is that an exchange of planes took
place in mid-air. The CIA developed plans for covert operations that involved
the in-flight swapping of commercial
airplanes with military drones since the 1960s. One such plan was called
Operation Northwoods. In this plan it was stated that the selected passengers
would all be boarded under carefully prepared aliases. After the swap the
commercial plane would be landed in a military base. The drone would continue
to fly and appearing on radar as the original commercial plane and would be
remotely guided all the way into the target.[28]
However, some debris from Flight 175 was recovered nearby, including the
landing gear found on top of a building on the corner of West Broadway and Park
Place, an engine found at Church and Murray Street, and a section of the
fuselage which landed on top of WTC5. In April 2013, a piece of the inboard
wing flap mechanism from a Boeing 767 was discovered wedged between two
buildings at Park Place.[29]
How could this be possible when the plane disappeared totally into the
building and this building totally collapsed? The portion of the fuselage of
Flight 175 was found on the 25th of October 2001 on the roof of WTC5. A picture
taken 39 days after the attacks from the roof of WTC5 did not show this piece
of fuselage. This indicates that this piece of fuselage must have been planted
there later. Moreover, the engine found on Murray Street near the South Tower
has been identified as a General Electric engine while United Airlines used
Pratt and Whitney engines for their 767 airplanes.[30]
A similar
type of cover-up can explain the presence of a portion of the main landing gear
of Flight 11 at the corner of Rector and West Streets and the other found
pieces of debris from Flight 175.
Minutes
after the crash in Pennsylvania, news was already circulating that several
passengers had made calls with their cell phones from the hijacked planes
including Flight 175. In the days following 9/11 the FBI interviewed the
various people who had received these phone calls from their relatives on the
planes. Some of these receivers could determine that cell phones were used as
the caller ID showed their relatives’ number. However, those passengers who called
their relatives from their cell phones could not have placed these calls from
the planes in flight in 2001. A Japanese experiment in 2003 using the same type
of cell phones available in 2001 showed that this was impossible for all types
of cell phones at altitudes higher than 8000 feet. So as the planes were flying
at 30000 feet or in any case well above 8000 feet these cell phones were
completely useless for communication. On top of that the high speeds of the
planes would have further blocked the transfer from one receiving station to
another and the calls would have been dropped. When it became clear that cell
phones could not have been used the official narrative on this issue became
more and more ambiguous and non-committal. In the 9/11 Commission Report only
one mention on the cell phones remained. No indication was made which calls
were made by airphones and which by cell phones.[31]
So from
where were these calls made? A similar scenario as what happened with the
passengers of Flight 11 seems to have taken place with the passengers of Flight
175. Most probably the plane took off without passengers. These passengers were
told that they were participating in a military live hijacking exercise
conducted as part of the wargames under way that morning. They were taken to a
secure area where selected passengers and crew could place their calls
according to the script they received. The calls from the passengers and crew
described a situation very similar to the one of Flight 11.[32]
Hijackers had taken over the plane, killed both pilots and stabbed a stewardess.
They had used knives and maze and said that they had a bomb. The passengers
were calling from the back of the plane and spoke often surprisingly calm.
The
presented facts above clearly demonstrate that no commercial airline could have
hit the South Tower. Most probably a military aircraft was used instead.
The Attack on the Pentagon
According
to the official version American Airlines Flight 77 (AA
77) , a Boeing 757 en route from Dulles Airport near Washington to Los Angeles,
carrying 58 passengers, four flight attendants and two pilots crashed into the
Pentagon about 9:40 a.m.
Flight 77
made a turn of 330 degrees and headed for the Pentagon with a speed of about 530
mph. It flew for a short time horizontal above a grass lawn just few meters
above the ground. At a distance of 30 meters from the Pentagon, the right wing
hit a mobile diesel generator, the fuel of which caught fire. The right engine
swept away the concertina mesh and the posts of a fence around the generator. The
right wing went up, the left down. The left engine hit the ground almost
exactly as the nose of the Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon, just below the first
floor. Flight 77 exploded and turned into an orange fireball from which a thick
cloud of black smoke rose, up to 100 meters high.[33]
The flight
speed of 530 mph, sharp turn and low to the surface flying of the object that
hit the Pentagon could not have been of a commercial plane such as a 757
Boeing. That is aerodynamically not possible. However, military fighters are
able to do so. That could have been on autopilot with remote control. Moreover
the alleged hijacker pilot was never able to control a commercial airplane in
such a manoeuvre.[34]
Why did AA 77
not plunge much more easily on the roof of the Pentagon which would have caused
a much greater damage? If an inside job was in place they would have kept the
damage to a minimum. So that can explain why the attack was done on the
exterior wall that has recently been reinforced to withstand a terrorist
attack.[35]
The 9/11 attack on the Pentagon was on Wedge 1 where 34 accountants,
bookkeepers etc. were killed. They had recently been moved to this part of the
Pentagon. As a result no 2001 financial report could be made. In 2013 the
unaccounted amount in the Pentagon budgets rose to a staggering 8,5 Trillion
dollars. One ex-Pentagon employee stated that she had been involved in
falsifying accounting records during many years.[36]
The impact
at the Pentagon does not reflect the crash of a Boeing 757. It must have been
caused by something other than a Boeing 757. The Pentagon gash is too small
both vertically and horizontally. A Boeing 757’s tail is 40 feet tall with
landing gear up while the maximum height of the hole in the Pentagon could not
have been 30 feet tall (two stories). The width of the hole was less than 20
feet before the façade collapsed, and windows above the impact hole were
intact. The largest width claimed for the hole is 65 feet and that was after
the façade collapsed, not upon impact. The 757 wingspan is 125 feet, about
twice the width of the post-façade-collapse hole.[37]
Source: We
Have Some Holes in the Plane Stories https://nomoregames.net/2006/03/05/we-have-some-holes-in-the-plane-stories/
How could
the fuselage, which is the weakest part of the plane, penetrate the façade
almost entirely and make a perfect round exit hole at the C-ring of the
building? And how can you explain the
absence of identifiable large pieces of debris which are usually found after
the crash of an airliner. No tail, no wheels, no engines, no chairs, and no
luggage. Normally the core of the engines should have survived the impact. All
the debunkers have to show for Flight 77 is a small piece of wreckage carrying
an American Airlines serial number. But this piece could have been placed by
anyone unto the grass after the impact. In fact, unidentified men in suits were
seen meddling with the debris right after the impact in direct violation of the
rules of a crime scene.[38]
Exit hole C-ring. Source: "September 11 - The New Pearl
Harbor" – Massimo Mazzucco (part 2)
According
to the official story of 9/11 the plane knocked down five light poles as it
approached the Pentagon without any of them shearing the wings off even though
it was travelling at a very high speed. However, according to Newtonian physics
the forces in a collision are equal and opposite. If these poles had really
been struck by a plane the ends of both wings would now be sheared off and
would be lying on the ground nearby. Any plane flying at 500 mph with this kind
of wing damage would instantly become uncontrollable and incapable of flight.
At this low level (the poles are only 40 feet tall) the out of control plane
would have struck the ground immediately causing it to tumble over and over,
breaking up into a long trail of burning wreckage. If the light poles and other
objects were indeed knocked down by a flying vehicle it must have been a super
advanced vehicle with that capability. Either that or the poles were brought
down by some other means on, or just before, 9/11. In any case, the damage at
the Pentagon is not consistent with being struck by a medium-sized passenger
jet.[39]
The
authorities could have easily proven that it was really American Airlines
Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon by showing the numerous CCTV tapes that
recorded the actual event. However, the tapes of the security cameras at the
Pentagon were immediately confiscated by the FBI within hours of the event. It
concerned 85 tapes. The FBI stated that only one video tape showed the impact
of Flight 77 into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. The FBI refused to share
the other tapes with the public so that they could see for themselves. In the
only two released video tapes in 2006 one cannot see clearly that it was a
Boeing 757. It looks more like a missile. It seems that intentional
manipulation, or photoshopping, has been conducted on crucial frames to hide
the true image of the object that hit the Pentagon.[40]
Pentagon video tape. Source: "September 11 - The New Pearl
Harbor" – Massimo Mazzucco (part 2)
The only
CCTV footage released of the Pentagon appears to show some kind of white smoke.
According to the official explanation this smoke comes from a damaged engine from
the plane. So how could this plane fly in a straight line with a damaged
engine?[41]
Despite all
the facts against a commercial airliner hitting the Pentagon there was a
witness who stated that he saw an American Airliner crashing at the Pentagon. Lieutenant Colonel Steven O’Brien was in the cockpit
of a military cargo plane that was flying above Washington when he saw at a
distance of about 6 kilometres a large silver passenger plane passing by in a
rapidly descending line. According to O’Brien it was a Boeing 757 or 767 and
most probably one of American Airlines at it had a silver fuselage with a red
stripe. He was requested by an air traffic controller to follow that plane.[42]
The testimony of O’Brien has raised a number of questions. How could one expect
an unwieldy cargo plane, which had a maximum speed of 366 mph, to keep up with
a Boeing airliner which the official report says was traveling at 530 mph?[43]
Looking at
all the above stated facts which rule out the involvement of a Boeing 757 in
the Pentagon crash one gets the strong suspicion that Lieutenant Colonel Steven
O’Brien formed part of a cover-up. Or maybe he was fooled by a military
aircraft that looked like an American Airline Boeing 757 through using plasma
technology? In fact AA 77 did not exist officially just as in the case of AA
11. The Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) has no record of AA 77 taking
off. It was not scheduled to fly on September 11, 2001 officially.[44]
Passenger Barbara Olson had called her husband
Theodore Olsen from the reported flight stating that all passengers and flight
personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed
hijackers. However, according to flight data provided by the NTSB, the Flight Deck
Door was never opened in flight. How were the hijackers able to gain access to
the cockpit, remove the pilots, and navigate the aircraft to the Pentagon if
the Flight Deck Door remained closed? This shows that the reported hijacking
aboard American Airlines Flight 77 was impossible to have existed.[45]
CNN mentioned in a story posted just before
midnight on 9/11 that Barbara Olson had used a cell phone to call her husband
and reported in a more extensive treatment on September 12 that Theodore Olson
had told that his wife called him twice on a cell phone from American Airlines
Flight 77. But on September 14, Olson said on Hannity & Colmes (Fox News)
that she had called collect and therefore must have been using the airplane
phone. On CNN’s Larry King Show later that same day, however, Olson returned to
his first version. However, it seems that in 2001 the American Airline Boeing
757 was not equipped with seatback airplane phones. So, besides the fact that
Barbara Olson’s alleged calls could not have been made from a cell phone, they
also could not have been made from an onboard phone.[46]
The
Crash at Shanksville, Pennsylvania
In the
official version United Airlines (UA) Flight 93, a Boeing 757 en route from
Newark, N.J., to San Francisco, carrying 37 passengers, two pilots and five
flight attendants crashed southeast of Pittsburgh around 10 a.m. ET at Shanksville,
Pennsylvania.
The Boeing
757 crashed when it was virtually turned upside down with a speed of about 560
miles/hour, its nose pointing downwards at a 40 degree angle and after cutting an
above-ground power line. It exploded and caught fire. The cockpit broke off,
pitched forward, and shattered into countless pieces, while the rest of the
plane dug more than 16 feet into the soft earth of a grassy field that had once
been the Diamond T open-pit mine.[47]
In reality
there were only small pieces of debris at the impact zone of alleged Flight 93.
No recognizable piece of a commercial plane like a window, a door, a fuselage
or a seat. According to the FBI all plane parts had been buried in the ground
beneath the soft dirt. Evidence technicians found the flight data recorder
about 12 feet below the surface and the cockpit voice recorder about 25 feet
deep. After two weeks 95 percent of the plane had been recovered according to
the official statements. But how could the hole cover itself up with soil
before the first responders arrived? And where are the plane remains? Why were
they never shown to the public?[48]
The FBI also found the passports of the hijackers and the notes they had
written to themselves. A knife was found which the hijackers supposedly had used.[49]
Shanksville Crash Site. Source: Be
the Next Hero: The Investigation of United Flight 93 https://www.fbi.gov/video-repository/investigation-of-flight-93.mp4/view#
An aerial
view of the impact crater of Flight 93 suggests that the plane plunged into the
soft ground on a nearly vertical trajectory, yet a debris field was reported as
far away as eight miles. Since it was a virtually windless morning, the physics
make no sense: a hole with vertical wing marks (but no wings!) a fraction of
the 125 feet wingspan of an intact 757 suggests a nearly vertical trajectory
into soft ground but debris over a wide area suggests an explosion within the
plane or by an air-to-air missile. A shoot-down might explain an 8-mile debris
field but that would make the “airplane-outline” hole impossible because the
plane presumably would have broken up in mid-air.[50]
Instead of
the expected black smoke after a plane crash due to the burning of the fuel the
citizens of Shanksville saw a grey mushroom cloud under which is the classic
shape of a bomb explosion. A local reporter noticed the absence of smell from
burnt jet fuel and the odour of scorched earth instead. The dry and untouched
grass next to the impact hole was not burnt which indicated that there was no
fire after the explosion. A shootdown hypothesis is also confirmed by other
elements than the scattered debris. Lights flickered due to the fact that the
power went off just before the impact which could be the result of zapping the
radar frequencies on everything before they shot the plane. Witness Barry
Lighty, major of Indian Lake, said that it sounded as a missile that came
across their house. Other witnesses in Shanksville also heard the sound of a
missile.[51]
According
to Ernie Stull, the mayor of Shanksville, there was no plane at the crash site,
only a hole. Capt. Frank Monaco of the Pennsylvania State Police said that they
haven’t seen anything bigger than a phone book, certainly nothing that would
resemble a part of a plane. Nena Lensbouer was the first to go up to the
smoking crater and she described a hole 5-6 feet deep and stated that she heard
an explosion like an atomic bomb, not a crash. Coroner Wallace Miller was
stunned at how small the smoking crater looked. He did not see any bodies and was
surprised that there was not a drop of blood. The government did not allow public
access to the flight data and cockpit voice recorders it allegedly recovered.
The FBI refused to allow a detailed investigation of the crash site, and it
filled in the crater with dirt followed by topsoil and had scorched trees cut
down and shredded into mulch, most likely hiding explosive residue from a
missile or other source. No Boeing 757 crashed in the designated hole in
Shanksville. It is physically impossible.[52]
Most likely
the Shanksville crash was a drone craft of some kind, and there is evidence
that the substitute craft was shot down.[53]
Moments before the crash of UA 93 witness Susan McIlwain saw a small unmarked
white plane fly over her car in the direction of the crash site when she was
half a mile away from that site. She said: “It was so smooth and it just glided
right over me just like that”.[54]
Most probably this drone missile crashed at the Shanksville site and another missile
shot down the substitute plane.
Surprisingly
it was again Lieutenant Colonel Steven O’Brien and
his crew of the military cargo plane Gofer 06 that witnessed the crash at
Shanksville from the air. After seeing AA 77 crashing at the Pentagon Gofer 06 was
heading for its home base in Minnesota via a northwestern route over
Pennsylvania. Just after ten o'clock a crew member saw black smoke rising in
the distance. O’Brien informed the Cleveland flight controllers that the smoke
plume was about 20 miles away, and as high as a mile.[55]
One gets the impression that Lieutenant Colonel Steven O’Brien was not a
witness of the two crash sites by sheer luck but on instruction by others.
According
to the official version many phone calls were made from Flight 93. Even in the
final official version two of these calls remained registered as mobile phone
calls. Due to the altitude and speed of the plane at the time of these calls
this is completely impossible. CeeCee Lyles, who was said to be a flight attendant
on UA Flight 93, called her husband and left a voicemail, calmly telling him
about the hijacking, how much she loves him, how she hopes to see him again,
etc. If she really was a flight attendant somehow able to use a phone, she
would have contacted the authorities to tell them all she could about the
flight position in order to assist a rescuing plane. That is what flight
attendants do in an emergency. Lyles was not a flight attendant or a passenger
on 9/11. She was used by others to direct us away from the truth.[56]
Just as in
the case with the other alleged hijacked commercial airplanes selected crew and
passengers from Flight 93 were brought to a secure area where they made their
scripted phone calls under the instruction that they formed part of a military
test. It looks as if CeeCee Lyles had understood more of this test than she was
supposed to have because at the end of one of her calls she bravely whispered
the words “It’s a frame”.
On the basis
of the above discussed facts concerning the four attacks on 9/11 I do agree
with Gerard Holmgren that no commercial planes were involved in the attacks on
the Twin Towers, the Pentagon and the crash in a field in Shanksville,
Pennsylvania. Coincidentally, the United States military was that day engaged
in five separate war game exercises that were almost identical to the attacks
that took place on the morning of 9/11, with simulated phantom planes on live
radar screens confusing radar operators.[57]
As a result of the war game exercises many of the airliners moving across air
traffic radar screens were only virtual with no way for the controllers to tell
the difference. It would have been very easy to virtually hijack these virtual
planes and then pretend they were real with collusion between the airline
companies and the airports.[58]
A probable
scenario of all airplane swaps has been supplied by the Dutch investigator Frank
Smits in a video.[59]
Radar area J53 was disabled by the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) in the early morning of 9/11.
As a result, all supposed hijacked aircraft flew through an area without radar
coverage. Three of the airplane swaps took place in poor radar areas and he
suggests that AA 11 and UA 175 were replaced by
military aircrafts which crashed in the Twin Towers and that AA 77 and UA 93
were replaced by military aircrafts that fired cruise missiles into the Pentagon
and the Shanksville field. The airplane swap of UA 175 was visible on the
radar. According to Smits the approximate 200 passengers from all four planes
were all brought together in UA 93 which landed finally at Hopkins Airport in
Cleveland.
However,
according to the official version the plane that landed at Hopkins Airport in
Cleveland was Delta Flight 1989 which was also suspected to be hijacked. Two
unarmed fighter jets were sent to intercept Delta Flight 1989. Finally it was
discovered that this plane was not hijacked and it landed without incidents in
Cleveland escorted by the two fighter jets.[60]
Delta Flight 1989 landed at 10.10 am and had 69 passengers on board which were
evacuated to FAA Headquarters. There were rumours that Delta Flight 1989 carried
a bomb. This led to a number of measures on the ground: people at the airport
were not allowed to take their car, bus drivers were threatened with death if
they left the airport, and the adjacent NASA Center with 3500 employees was
evacuated. Local media and eyewitnesses however distinctly report a different
plane with different characteristics. This plane landed at 10.45 am with 200
passengers on board which were evacuated to the NASA Glenn Research Center.[61]
Time of landing and number of passengers aboard this plane seem to validate the
suggestion above by Smits that this was UA 93 with the passengers from all
involved planes.
We were
told that the flight data recorders for AA 11 and UA 175 were never found. For
AA 77 and UA 93 the flight data recorders were found in good condition.
However, the model and serial numbers of these flight data recorders are not
mentioned in the reports made available by the authorities. It is therefore
impossible to know if they came from Flight AA 77 and UA 93.[62]
The meticulous data kept on every airliner taking-off at every airport in the
country showed no elapsed run-way time, wheels-off time and taxi-out time, not
to mention several other categories left blank on 9/11 concerning the Flights
AA 11 and AA 77. Although Flights 11 and 77 have the above data meticulously
logged on 9/10, it was suspiciously absent on 9/11. UA 175 received messages
through ground stations located in Harrisburg and then later routed through a
ground station in Pittsburgh, 20 minutes after the aircraft allegedly impacted
the South Tower in New York. UA 93 was in the vicinity of Fort Wayne, Indiana
and Champaign, Illinois, 500+ miles away from the alleged crash site in
Shanksville at the time of this crash. Both UA 175 and UA 93 were still
registered and valid more than 4 years after their alleged destruction. The two
United Airlines flights were not deregistered until October 2005, as of
official FAA records.[63]
The four
implicated commercial planes simply landed at other airports in unscheduled
landings, during the mass confusion when all flights were ordered to land. They
were switched in flight either for drones or missiles.[64]
Others assume that all four planes were taken over and flown to an almost
completely disused airbase in Massachusetts, called Westover Airbase, where the
night before it had been cleared of all its residual personnel and which had large oversized
hangars big enough to put 757s in. The planes themselves were then later flown
down to Florida where there is a company which converts commercial 757s to
commercial industrial versions and were reused in that way as cargo planes.[65]
We do not
know for sure where the planes finally went as we do not have sufficient proof.
However, we have sufficient evidence to state that no commercial planes were
hijacked on 9/11 and did not crash in the Twin Towers, the Pentagon or the
field in Shanksville. This forces us to investigate in more detail the alleged
hijackers and the lists of passengers.
No Hijackers in Commercial
Planes on 9/11
Sorry, no
hijackers? But we were shown footages of some alleged hijackers at one of the
implicated airports. The FBI managed to name the 19 Arabs involved only three
days after the attacks, and their names, faces and biographies were promptly
splashed across the mainstream media. Surprisingly their passports and suicide
notes were found at the crash scenes in spite of fiery crashes which completely
incinerated the planes including the normally indestructible flight recorder
boxes, and all the occupants. In another miraculous stroke of good luck for the
evidence hunters, the luggage of alleged ringleader, Mohammed Atta, was somehow
left behind at Logan airport and just happened to contain instructions to his
fellow conspirators. And it seems that they learned how to fly the giant
Boeings at the last minute by reading flight manuals on the way to the airport
because they conveniently left the manuals, in Arabic of course, in the cars
they had rented.[66]
However, nobody has produced an image of any of
these 19 alleged terrorists boarding the planes that were involved in these
attacks. The only available image just after the 9/11 attacks was from a
security camera showing the alleged hijackers Alomari and Atta going through a
security checkpoint at 05.45.13 am. This is, however, not the boarding of Flight
AA 11 from Boston to Los Angeles but a previous connecting flight from Portland
Maine to Boston. Only in 2005 images were shown for the alleged hijackers of Flight
AA 77 passing through security checks at Washington Dulles airport. But the
timestamp was cropped out or absent all together. So this could have been at
any time prior to 9/11 possibly during a dry run the terrorists did along the
same routes. Moreover the video made available is not a time lapse photography
producing an average of one frame per second as was normal for security cameras
in 2001. It is a continuous recording similar to those obtained with regular
consumer type cam-recorders.[67]
So where
are the images of the terrorists standing in line for the check-in, getting
their boarding passes, moving through the lounge areas, making phone calls,
using stairs and conveyor belts, visiting the duty free shops, or having a
snack before departure? At the airports each of these premises have security
cameras of their own. And where are the
images of the alleged terrorists seated in the departure lounges waiting for
the boarding call and finally proceeding through the gates that would take them
to the airplanes?[68]
Coincidentally,
Boston Logan Airport had no security cameras to verify that the alleged hijackers
were in the departure lounges or that they boarded either American Airlines
Flight 11 or United Airlines Flight 175, the flights that crashed into the Twin
Towers.[69]
We do not
have a single sound bite of the voices of the alleged hijackers from the four
cockpit voice recorders. We were told that the voice recorders of AA 11 and UA 175
were never found. The voice recorder of AA 77 was found but we were told that its
contents were damaged to the level that they were unusable. This is strange
because these black boxes, which are in fact orange and comprise of the data
flight recorder and the cockpit voice recorder, are built to withstand very
high temperatures and the most violent levels of impacts. For UA 93 we were told that the cockpit voice recorder
was found in good condition but for unknown reasons this recording was never
made public. We were told that the horror recorded was not fit for public
consumption. The only pieces of conversations from some of the alleged
hijackers in the cockpits were recorded by air traffic controllers on the
ground when these alleged hijackers apparently punched the wrong keys talking
to their passengers. However, these recordings could have been transmitted by
anyone from anywhere. They don’t prove that these people were actually abord
the planes. These recordings could have been used as a substitute for the lack
of conversation from the four cockpit voice recorders.[70]
How
embarrassing for the FBI when some of the alleged hijackers started turning up
alive, protesting their innocence! On September 16 one of the alleged hijackers
of Flight 11, Abdulrahman al-Omari, visited the US consulate in Jeddah and
demanded an explanation why his name was within the list of hijackers. He
received an official apology from the consulate officials. On September 22
another alleged Flight 11 hijacker, Waleed al Shehri, announced that he is
still alive from his house in Casablanca, Morocco. Two further alleged
hijackers were still alive and worked as pilots for Saudi Arabian Airlines.
Another one worked in Saudi Arabia in an oil refinery.[71]
And even
more embarrassing when the first passenger lists provided by the airlines to
CNN did not contain a single Arabic name. And none of the names on the
passenger lists are alleged to be aliases for any of the Arabs. Within a few
weeks of "identifying" the hijackers, the FBI was then forced to
admit that they actually had no idea who the hijackers were.[72]
The 19
alleged hijackers were portrayed as militant members of Al-Qaida and devote Muslims
who sacrificed their lives as suicide attackers to hit the enemy United States
in its own backyard. However, this description of the hijackers is far from
correct. The alleged ringleader, Mohammed Atta, had a stripper girlfriend,
Amanda Keller, who said that he was always drinking alcohol and that he had
together with his friends massive quantities of cocaine. They were often stoned
and drunk. They were not at all careful and the night before the attacks they
were drinking in Portland and paid their bills with credit cards. They did
everything they could to leave traces of their presence there.[73]
There are
strong indications that many of these 19 alleged hijackers were in fact used as
scapegoats by the real instigators of the 9/11 attacks to let the world believe
that this was an Al-Qaeda operation. For example, the alleged hijacker leader,
Mohamed Atta, was trying to leave the people he encountered with memories that
would support the official myth. In one such incident, occurring around April
of 2000, Atta attempted to seek a U.S. government loan to help him purchase and
modify a crop dusting plane for large-scale chemical use. In his one-hour
encounter with Johnell Bryant, a federal employee from whom he was seeking the
loan, Atta talked about security at the World Trade Center and buildings in
Washington. He went on to talk about his connection to Al Qaeda and his
admiration for Osama bin Laden. Certainly not an action of someone trying to
keep a highly secret terrorist plot from being discovered.[74]
The US visa
issued to 15 of the alleged hijackers at the Jeddah consulate were done by
personnel that were secret CIA officers. The CIA assisted the training of these
people in the US at several US military facilities. Of the alleged hijackers 5
were experienced mujahideen who had travelled together to fight in Bosnia under
a contract with MPRI, a private firm which has more 4-star generals on their
payroll than the Pentagon.[75]
Mohamed
Atta had associations with people linked to the CIA. For example, Luai Sakra,
an informant for the CIA, was reportedly in contact with Atta before 9/11.
Moreover, it is known that the CIA made efforts to recruit another of Atta’s
friends. This was Mamoun Darkazanli, who along with Atta was a member of the
Hamburg Al-Qaeda cell. Atta was involved in many incidents in a short period
before 9/11 but he enjoyed the unbelievable luck with regard to lack of
prosecution or interrogation.[76]
Mohamed Atta seemed to be protected by U.S. authorities and might have been an
intelligence asset.[77]
Passengers of the
Commercial Planes on 9/11
There are
quite a number of surprising and suspicious facts concerning the lists of
passengers and crew for the four alleged implicated commercial planes.
First of
all, of a total 760 seats there were only 198 passengers on the 4 alleged
flights. Flight 11 and Flight 175, both Boeing 767s with approximately 180
available seats, had 76 and 46 passengers respectively. Flight 77 and Flight
93, both Boeing 757s with approximately 200 available seats, had 50 and 26
passengers respectively. It is known, however, that major airliners in the U.S.
regularly shift their passengers to other flights and airlines serving the same
cities if numbers are too low to justify the flight. But on the morning of
9/11, this protocol, like so many others that day, was not followed.[78]
Curiously,
half of the pilots and co-pilots of the four aircraft involved in the attacks
had been assigned to the doomed flights at the last minute, very shortly before
September 11. What is more, over half of the flight attendants, 13 out of a
total of 25, were not originally scheduled to be on the four targeted aircraft,
and many of the passengers, including almost half of those on Flight 93, were
not originally booked to be on those flights.[79]
Those passengers of Flight 93 were originally supposed to be on another flight,
Flight 91, scheduled for 9 a.m. They arrived early at the airport and got
standby tickets on Flight 93 – although Flight 93 was delayed and didn’t take
off until around 8:42 anyway.[80]
Three
planes were scheduled to fly to Los Angeles, arriving around the same time. However,
there has been no sign of Flight 175, Flight 11, or Flight 77 passenger pickups
or victims’ families at Los Angeles Airport at the scheduled arrival time. No
media sightings of waiting victims’ families and worried friends, eager for
information, as we would expect from three commercial plane crashes.[81]
Of the 266
official names of passengers and crew who were supposed to have died in the
four passenger jets, only 58 names have appeared on the Social Security Death
Index (SSDI), a privately owned website not affiliated with the Social Security
Administration. Ellen Mariani, who lost her husband Louis on Flight 175, had
tried to get in touch with the relatives of other family members, but to no
avail. In the 9/11 Victims Compensation Final Report one can read that only 169
family members of the 266 passengers and crew accepted the compensation fund. No
details of the people who benefitted were supplied. It seems that the 9/11
culprits faked the number of plane victims and also faked the number who
claimed victim compensation.[82]
The 9/11
culprits wanted to keep the number of passengers as low as possible, so that
they would have to fake as few deaths as possible. For these fakes the general
modus operandi is to combine several lists for the death list. The first list
is composed of people who really did recently die, either from old age or other
causes. This list also includes people who recently died on military bases or
in military accidents worldwide. These people are put on the fatality list for
the event, and their date of death is simply moved up a couple of days. People
with no family are commonly used, or people whose families can be easily paid
off. In a big event like this that has been planned well in advance. A second used
list is people from prominent families who need to fake their deaths for some
reason. And then we have a third list of intelligence
agents who are going undercover. These people can fake their deaths and change
their names, facilitating their move into covert operations. If those lists
added together still aren't enough, the government just makes up people. The
CIA has databases of unused names and untagged photos it can combine with a
fake bio, manufacturing a life from scratch. All of those in the promoted 9/11 stories
are obvious intelligence agents, and best guess is they just changed their
names by a letter or two or pretended to be a sibling.[83]
It may be
the case that at least some of the alleged 9/11 plane passengers never existed
– they are VicSims or virtual victims created using an early version of
software that creates incredibly realistic faces generated by a neural network
based on Artificial Intelligence.[84]
The 4 airplane pilots (Captain John Ogonowski of AA 11, Captain Victor Saracini of UA 175, Captain Charles Burlingame of AA 77 and Captain Jason Dahl of UA 93) were former military officers.[85] Another interesting find is that many of the 9/11 pilots had generations of military/ambassador family backgrounds and most of the pics at the memorials and online are the same ones used. This leads evidence to suggest that many of them grew up and were possibly groomed for intelligence services and subsequently were put into action to have their identities disappear as their roles in 9/11.[86]
The pilot of Flight 11 was John Ogonowski. Curiously, he has a brother named Jim (or sometimes James) who later ran for Congress but his date of birth is unknown on the ourcampaigns.com website.[87] Both John and Jim worked as farm advocates in Massachusetts. Are we sure Jim isn't John? There are no pictures available of Jim young, or before 2001, as we would expect. According to ourcampaigns.com, Jim is also US Air Force, Lt. Colonel. So both brothers were Air Force and farm advocates, and look identical. Both also went to University of Massachusetts. Strangely, there is no info on the internet that confirms that they are brothers. They are not listed as relatives. Jim is listed as related to Carol, while John is related to Caroline. So, it looks like John changed his name to Jim, was promoted to Lt. Colonel, and hung out at Mountain Home AFB in Idaho for a couple of years, before transitioning into his fake brother.[88]
A picture
of John Ogonowski was removed from the CNN 911 memorial somewhat early and out
of step with all the other removals. Was there an issue with the picture they
used? Were mistakes made that needed to be rectified? However, one can
understand why they pulled the CNN memorial picture so early and replaced it
with nothing. It is because the picture used in the 9/11 memorial was indeed a
picture of James (Jim) Ogonowski, John Ogonowski's brother. And most will agree
when seeing the simple comparison below. The first 2 pictures are a match.
While the 3rd doesn't match either the 1st or 2nd picture.[89]
 John Ogonowski CNN 911 Memorial picture. |
 James Ogonowski, former
Senator & John's brother. |
 John Ogonowski, wearing his stripes in the cockpit of a plane. |
All
pictures of John Ogonowski are fake, some having heavy amounts of photo
reworking, manipulation and can be proven to be fake. To some extent or
another, the entire family was in on this hoax, and that they as a family, also
profited immensely from the events of 9/11. Their wealth is well over 10-15
million dollars, and closer to 25-30 million. People often ask or wonder how so
many could lie to such a degree. Well, for starters, they have 10-15 million
good reasons, if not a whole lot more.[90]
Flight 77 passenger Barbara Olson had been a top legal counsellor for the government, being involved in both the Travelgate and Filegate investigations against the Clintons. Before that she had been a key player in the Clarence Thomas hearings, being a supporter of Thomas. She is one of the ones they hired to attack Anita Hill. It is suspected that Barbara Olson was an intelligence agent all along. After 9/11, she simply faked her death and went deeper into intelligence, with a name change and reassignment.[91]
A few years after 9/11, Theodore Olson, former U.S. Solicitor General, got
remarried to a woman who looks uncannily like his deceased wife, Barbara. She
looks to be Barbara after losing weight and undergoing some facial plastic
surgery. Here is a side-by-side with an image of Lady Booth, the current wife
of Theodore Olson. There is no doubt that these two women look nearly
identical. The question is whether the Barbara Olson (born Barbara Kay Bracher
in Houston on December 27, 1955) is the same person as Lady Evelyn Booth (born
in Louisville, Kentucky, on October 26, 1960) – or do they simply look very
similar?[92]
After
diligent search, only one indication was found that Lady Booth even existed
prior to December 2001. No pictures and records of her at grade school, high
school or college. Records indicate that, in 1988, someone by that name was
licensed to practice law in New York, and she was said to have practiced law
for 21 years. The telephone number listed as hers was for an address in Vienna,
Virginia, a few miles from CIA Headquarters in McLean, Virginia. During the
early 1990’s, Barbara Bracher (later Barbara Olson) also lived in McLean.[93]
On board Flight 77 there was a high density of passengers who worked at classified positions in the defence sector: between 16 and 21 persons out of a total of 58 passengers. The majority were aerospace engineers. One passenger, Mr. Yamnicky, was a longtime CIA operative. Another passenger, Mr. Caswell, led a team of about one hundred scientists for the US Navy. Others worked for Boeing and Raytheon in El Segundo, California, on a project dubbed Black Hawk. All these passengers were officially reported dead on September 11, 2001 at the Pentagon.[94] Captain Charles Burlingame, pilot of Flight 77, had been a TOPGUN, and had also worked at the Pentagon. So it is ironic he was the pilot of the plane that flew into the Pentagon.[95]
With some
exceptions, the alleged passengers were manufactured or used identities. There
is no mention of anyone saying publicly that they went with an alleged
passenger to the airport or the gate in the official report. Most passengers
were instead agents connected to the plot who were chosen to help cover up the
crime. Agents pretending to be passengers were seen at the Cleveland Hopkins
Airport late that morning. They walked toward a NASA building to make calls to
the media to straighten out an impression many had that the Internet reported
that Flight 93 had landed in Cleveland.[96]
However, we
were told that within a
year, medical examiners had identified the remains of 33 victims who had been
on board Flight 11.[97]
In March 2002, Betty Ong's remains were recovered from Ground Zero and
identified. She was cremated and her ashes were buried at Cypress Lawn Memorial
Park in Colma, California.[98]
The Armed Forces DNA
Identification Laboratory used DNA samples to match recovered remains with the
last of 40 crew members and passengers aboard Flight 93. Investigators segregated remains which yielded DNA samples that did not
match DNA profiles of the 40 passengers and crew. Those, by process of
elimination, are the hijackers, and their remains are being grouped by common
DNA.[99]
The
evidence that Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon is the government’s claim to
have obtained from the wreckage enough bodies and body parts to match the DNA
for each person on the passenger list and flight crew. Simultaneously, the
absence of passenger luggage, fuselage, wing and tail sections -- indeed the
absence of a 100,000 pound airliner -- is attributed to the vaporization of the
airplane due to the high speed crash and intense fire. The incompatibility of
vaporized metal but recovered flesh and blood is hard to believe.[100]
Conclusion and Final
Remarks
On the
basis of the facts and evidence displayed in this document I can confirm the
hypothesis from Gerard Holmgren that no commercial planes were involved in the 9/11
attacks on the Twin Towers, the Pentagon and the crash in a field in
Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Most probably AA 11 and UA 175 were replaced by
military aircrafts which crashed in the Twin Towers and AA 77 and UA 93 were
replaced by military aircrafts that fired cruise missiles into the Pentagon and
the Shanksville field. As a consequence also no hijackers and passengers crashed
in commercial planes on 9/11.
The entire
event was planned and carried out by a group of leading officials within the US
government and its agencies such as the CIA and FBI. This planning must have
taken a number of years in order to make sure that this false flag operation would
succeed and the world population would not question the official 9/11 story.
Without the
manipulations from the 9/11 culprits the alleged hijacked planes should have
been intercepted by jet fighters before it got anywhere near its crash
destination. Furthermore, in the event of a hijacking, the crew only has to
punch in a four-digit hijacking code to alert Air Traffic Control (ATC) to a
hijacking. We are supposed to believe the impossibility that hijackers took over
the planes by the crude method of threatening people with boxcutters without
ATC first receiving a distress code. And that the alleged hijackers achieved
the impossible 4 times out of 4.[102]
Coincidentally, the United States military was that day engaged in five
separate war game exercises that were almost identical to the attacks that took
place on the morning of 9/11, with simulated phantom planes on live radar
screens confusing radar operators. Coincidentally, no one in the US military
thought to contact the Secretary of Defence, Donald Rumsfeld, and alert him
that four planes had been hijacked and one was headed for the Pentagon where he
remained at his desk until the crash. Coincidentally, the FAA Hijack Coordinator,
Lieutenant General Mike Canavan, was in Puerto Rico on the morning of September
11, and it was unclear if he was replaced while he was away. Coincidentally,
NORAD Commander in Chief, General Ralph Eberhart, set the alert levels of the NORAD
computer system Infocon to defend the Pentagon at its least protective level
the night before the attacks and could not be reached for 45 minutes after the
South Tower was struck.[103]
The no
commercial planes theory provides a common sense explanation why government BTS
records show that two of the four planes never took off that day and two others
were not decommissioned until four years later. It explains why the government could
not present a single airplane part by serial number for independent
corroboration, and why there is no confirmed debris of any of the alleged four
planes. It explains why the passenger lists are phony, and why there are
remarkably few alleged plane victims’ families requesting compensation. It makes
it understandable that several of the purported hijackers have turned up alive
and why the government apparently felt it necessary to produce such
unpersuasive evidence as hijacker passports, training manuals, etc. It explains
why there is no clear video of the Pentagon attack that shows a big passenger
jet approaching at ground level at high speed. And it explains why the
authorities destroyed the tapes of the flight controllers’ recollections of the
events of that day.[105]
One of the
objections often raised against the likelihood of an internal conspiracy
hatched by the US institutions and intelligence apparatus is the difficulty,
indeed the impossibility, of keeping such a secret when so many plotters and
executors were involved. The architects of the tragedy we witnessed on 9/11 are
in any case ruthless enough to also sacrifice those who might have blown the
whistle, mixing them with the other victims. The remains of the victims were
handled entirely by the military. It is therefore difficult to tell how and
where the passengers died.[106]
I think
that only a few people on the fake passenger and crew lists have actually died.
These could have been whistle blowers on the 9/11 false flag operation, some
alleged hijackers or people that the 9/11 culprits wanted to get rid of for political
or personal reasons or for concealing financial malpractice. One such candidate
on the Flight 77 passenger list could have been Bryan C. Jack who was
responsible for crunching America’s defence budget and headed the Pentagon’s
programming and fiscal economics division. On September 10, 2001, Rumsfeld
declared “war” on the Pentagon bureaucracy as there was a 2,3 Trillion dollar
accountancy problem for a one year budget. The attack on the Pentagon was on
Wedge 1 where 34 accountants, bookkeepers etc. were killed. They had recently
been moved to this part of the Pentagon. As a result no 2001 financial report
could be made.[107]
The
majority of passengers and crew on the 4 provided lists did not die on 9/11.
Some of them were manufactured non-existent people and some of them were
intelligence agents who took part in the false flag operation and went
undercover after 9/11. The 9/11 culprits made sure that nobody would expose the
false flag operation. The intelligence agents are trained to do so and surely
financial gains as in the case of the Ogonowski family will encourage them to
keep silent. However, I really hope that in the nearby future one will crack before
taking their last breath. This unbelievable crime of sacrificing your own
fellow citizens for geo-political reasons and personal financial gains must not
remain secret and unpunished. Without justice done democracy will remain under
attack.
[1] By Bert Meertens, independent investigator. For reference use https://kweliauuwongo.blogspot.com/2024/03/the-no-commercial-planes-on-911.html
[2] Manufactured
Terrorism - The Truth about Sept 11 - By Gerard Holmgren https://www.supremelaw.org/authors/holmgren/manufactured.html + https://www.supremelaw.org/authors/holmgren/manufactured2.html
[3] Naudet brothers 9/11
Documentary - 1st plane hits North Tower https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miA8Td4oNcY
[4] WTC 9/11 | First Plane Hit in North Tower | Jules Naudet Video (Remastered 60fps AI Upscaled) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=St7ny38gLp4
[5] NIST NCSTAR 1-2B, WTC Investigation
(NISTNCSTAR 1-2B_Chaps9-11.pdf) https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1O_wb7nuD9HGTb3wKYEcYbrcUeVv3_xzA
[6] 9/11 A Plane Story Uncensored
https://rumble.com/v3k3t3e-911-a-plane-story.html
[7] "September 11 - The New Pearl
Harbor" – Massimo Mazzucco (part 1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1GCeuSr3Mk
[8] Source: Susan Sachs in the
New York Times on September 15, 2001 https://web.archive.org/web/20131225060439/http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/15/us/after-attacks-trade-center-heart-rending-discoveries-digging-continues-lower.html
[9] Source: Patrice O'Shaughnessy
in Daily News on September 11th 2002 http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/2002/09/11/2002-09-11_more_than_half_of_victims_idd.html
[11] Staff Monograph on "Four
Flights and Civil Aviation Security" (page 7) https://www.archives.gov/files/research/9-11/staff-report-sept2005.pdf
[12] Mitchell Zuckoff, Fall and
Rise: the story of 9/11. HarperCollins, 2019 (page 75 in Dutch
version Ondergang en Opkomst, Het verhaal van 11 september, De Geus, 2019).
[13] Fog, Fiction and the Flight
11 Phone Calls https://archive.ph/2018.08.05-032214/https://documentarchive.wordpress.com/2018/08/05/fog-fiction-and-the-flight-11-phone-calls-by-loopdloop-snakedoctor-2/
[14] T7 B17 FBI 302s of Interest
Flight 11 FDR - Entire Contents (page 46, FBI interview with Elizabeth Williams
on September 13, 2001) https://www.scribd.com/document/14094215/T7-B17-FBI-302s-of-Interest-Flight-11-Fdr-Entire-Contents
[15] Fog, Fiction and the Flight 11
Phone Calls
[16] Fog, Fiction and the Flight 11
Phone Calls
[17] 9/11 A Plane Story Uncensored
https://rumble.com/v3k3t3e-911-a-plane-story.html
[18] Flight 175. Too Hot to Handle http://www.amics21.com/911/flight175/
[19] The Dual-Deception of 9-11
and the Fraudulent War on Terror https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opu_-S1yPPs
[20] The plane that hit the South
Tower was not Flight 175 http://www.amics21.com/911/flight175/dud.html
[21] Its The Flash! – By Dave von Kleist
https://911anomalies.wordpress.com/
[22] 9/11 A Plane Story Uncensored
https://rumble.com/v3k3t3e-911-a-plane-story.html
[23] The Plasma Plane https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmTSYQidOsk&t=14s
[24] The Twin Towers Trick https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwejW7qsevI&t=51s
[25] 9/11 A Plane Story Uncensored
https://rumble.com/v3k3t3e-911-a-plane-story.html
[26] Manufactured Terrorism - The
Truth about Sept 11 - By Gerard Holmgren
[27] ACARS Confirmed - 9/11 Aircraft
Airborne long after Crash https://pilotsfor911truth.org/ACARS-CONFIRMED-911-AIRCRAFT-AIRBORNE-LONG-AFTER-CRASH.html
[29] United Airlines Flight 175 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_175
[30] 9/11 A Plane Story Uncensored
[32] Mitchell Zuckoff, Fall and
Rise: the story of 9/11. HarperCollins, 2019 (page 127 in Dutch version).
[33] Mitchell Zuckoff, Fall and Rise:
the story of 9/11. HarperCollins, 2019 (page 191 in Dutch version).
[34] ZERO: An Investigation Into 9/11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-CxA3iBHzA
[35] "September 11 - The New
Pearl Harbor" – Massimo Mazzucco (part 1)
[36] Corbert Report 9/11 Trillions –
Follow the Money https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQTyj0g3m_E
[37] We Have Some Holes in the
Plane Stories https://nomoregames.net/2006/03/05/we-have-some-holes-in-the-plane-stories/
[38] "September 11 - The New Pearl
Harbor" – Massimo Mazzucco (part 2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7mDXHn_byA
[40] "September
11 - The New Pearl Harbor" – Massimo Mazzucco (part 2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7mDXHn_byA
[41] 9/11 A Plane Story Uncensored
[42] Mitchell
Zuckoff, Fall and Rise: the story of 9/11. HarperCollins, 2019 (page 186 in
Dutch version).
[43] Gofer and Trout: Questions on
Two Flights Out of Andrews AFB on 9/11 https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/12/06/gofer-and-trout-questions-on-two-flights-out-of-andrews-afb-on-911/
[44] 9/11 A Plane Story Uncensored https://rumble.com/v3k3t3e-911-a-plane-story.html
[45] 9/11: Pentagon Aircraft Hijack
Impossible https://pilotsfor911truth.org/american_77_hijack_impossible.html
[46] Could Barbara Olson Have Made
Those Calls? https://pilotsfor911truth.org/amrarticle.html
[47] Mitchell
Zuckoff, Fall and Rise: the story of 9/11. HarperCollins, 2019 (pages 229-230
in Dutch version).
[48] "September 11 - The New
Pearl Harbor" – Massimo Mazzucco (part 2)
[49] 9/11 A Plane Story Uncensored
https://rumble.com/v3k3t3e-911-a-plane-story.html
[50] We Have Some Holes in the Plane
Stories https://nomoregames.net/2006/03/05/we-have-some-holes-in-the-plane-stories/
[51] "September 11 - The New Pearl
Harbor" – Massimo Mazzucco (part 2)
[52] We Have Some Holes in the Plane
Stories https://nomoregames.net/2006/03/05/we-have-some-holes-in-the-plane-stories/
[53] Manufactured Terrorism - The
Truth about Sept 11 https://www.supremelaw.org/authors/holmgren/manufactured.html
[54] "September 11 - The New
Pearl Harbor" – Massimo Mazzucco (part 2)
[55] Mitchell Zuckoff, Fall and Rise:
the story of 9/11. HarperCollins, 2019 (page 230 in Dutch version).
[56] The proof that no real planes
crashed on 9/11 https://911planeshoax.com/
[57] Unanswered Questions: What
the September Eleventh Families Asked and the 9/11 Commission Ignored — an
Excerpt https://ic911.org/journal/articles/unanswered-questions-what-the-september-eleventh-families-asked-and-the-9-11-commission-ignored-an-excerpt/
[58] 911 and Israel's Great Game https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2mHisQT4zM&t=1s
[59] The Airplane Swaps https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3cvuHKzrfs&t=6s
[60] Mitchell Zuckoff, Fall and Rise:
the story of 9/11. HarperCollins, 2019 (pages 220 and 230 in Dutch version).
[61] The Cleveland Airport Mystery https://911woodybox.blogspot.com/2007/02/cleveland-airport-mystery.html
[63] The proof that no real planes
crashed on 9/11 https://911planeshoax.com/
[64] 911 Passengers http://mileswmathis.com/pass.pdf
[65] Interview conducted in 2019
with Lt. Col. Michael Aquino https://twitter.com/JoshWalkos/status/1733218566231539867
[66] Manufactured Terrorism - The
Truth about Sept 11
[67] "September 11 - The New Pearl
Harbor" – Massimo Mazzucco (part 1)
[68] "September 11 - The New Pearl
Harbor" – Massimo Mazzucco (part 1)
[69] Unanswered Questions: What
the September Eleventh Families Asked and the 9/11 Commission Ignored — an
Excerpt https://ic911.org/journal/articles/unanswered-questions-what-the-september-eleventh-families-asked-and-the-9-11-commission-ignored-an-excerpt/
[70] "September 11 - The New
Pearl Harbor" – Massimo Mazzucco (part 1)
[71] ZERO: An Investigation Into 9/11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-CxA3iBHzA
[72] Manufactured Terrorism - The Truth
about Sept 11
[73] ZERO: An Investigation Into 9/11
[74] Oswald and Atta: Erratic,
Protected, and Seeking Attention https://digwithin.net/2014/12/21/oswald-and-atta/
[75] ZERO: An Investigation Into
9/11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-CxA3iBHzA
[76] Oswald and Atta: Erratic,
Protected, and Seeking Attention
[77] U.S. Intelligence Agencies
Mock America in 9/11 Trial https://digwithin.net/2015/06/13/911trial/
[78] The proof that no real planes
crashed on 9/11 https://911planeshoax.com/
[79] http://911blogger.com/news/2012-02-10/new-evidence-reveals-half-pilots-were-only-assigned-911-flights-last-minute
[80] Were any of the passengers
supposed to be on flight UA93? https://aldeilis.net/english/were-any-of-the-passengers-supposed-to-be-on-flight-ua93/
[81] The proof that no real planes
crashed on 9/11 https://911planeshoax.com/
[82] The 9/11 Passenger List
Oddity http://www.truedemocracy.net/hj36/13b.html
[83] 911 Passengers http://mileswmathis.com/pass.pdf
[84] The proof that no real planes
crashed on 9/11 https://911planeshoax.com/
[85] Interview Kevin Ryan by Clayton
Morris https://www.bitchute.com/video/2KKiSGtRSR3x/
[86] Proven Fraud: Fl #11 - 1st Victim
of 9/11: John Ogonowski - Fake Pics in 911 Memorial https://archive.ph/ASbes
[88] 911 Passengers http://mileswmathis.com/pass.pdf
[89] Why the CNN 9/11 Memorial is
a Fraud https://letsrollforums.com/index.php?threads/why-the-cnn-9-11-memorial-is-a-fraud-by-phil-jayhan.772/page-2
[90] John Ogonowski Memorial -
Fake Victim of the September 11th Attacks on America! https://web.archive.org/web/20120718233641/http://letsrollforums.com/proven-fraud-fl-11-t22353.html
[91] 911 Passengers http://mileswmathis.com/pass.pdf
[92] The proof that no real planes
crashed on 9/11 https://911planeshoax.com/
[93] What Happened to Flight 77's
Passengers?
https://vaticproject.blogspot.com/2010/07/what-happened-to-flight-77s-passengers.html
[94] Surprising number of passengers on Flight AA77 that allegedly hit the Pentagon had military connections https://www.voltairenet.org/article163908.html
[95] 911 Passengers http://mileswmathis.com/pass.pdf
[96] Planes Without Passengers: The
Faked Hijackings of 9/11. Dean T. Hartwell, 2012 - 2nd edition
[97] Daily News on September 11th 2002 http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/2002/09/11/2002-09-11_more_than_half_of_victims_idd.html
[98] https://web.archive.org/web/20210516205311/https://www.cbsnews.com/news/more-remains-found-at-wtc-site/
[99] Flight 93 remains yield no evidence
https://aldeilis.net/english/flight-93-remains-yield-no-evidence/
[100] Business of Treason https://www.angelfire.com/ca3/espbooks/BizTreez_Illustrated_Web_2.7.7.pdf
[101] Strange facts about the autopsies https://aldeilis.net/english/strange-facts-about-the-autopsies/
[102] Manufactured Terrorism: The Truth
about Sept 11 - By Gerard Holmgren https://www.supremelaw.org/authors/holmgren/manufactured.html
[103] Unanswered Questions: What
the September Eleventh Families Asked and the 9/11 Commission Ignored — an
Excerpt https://ic911.org/journal/articles/unanswered-questions-what-the-september-eleventh-families-asked-and-the-9-11-commission-ignored-an-excerpt/
[104] "September 11 - The New Pearl
Harbor" (Part 1) https://youtu.be/O1GCeuSr3Mk
[105] Holmgren and Reynolds on No Planes
on 911- Exposing the Illusion http://desip.igc.org/NoPlanesOn911.html#note20
[106] Surprising number of passengers on Flight AA77 that allegedly hit the Pentagon had military connections https://www.voltairenet.org/article163908.html
[107] Corbert Report 9/11 Trillions
– Follow the Money https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQTyj0g3m_E
